Open Access

Table V.

The probability of detection (CSe) of HPAI H5N1 by different methods of wild waterbird surveillance, if infection was present in wild waterbirds on Lake Constance at 1%, 5% and 0.1% prevalence (P*u) from September 2006 to August 2007. Probabilities are shown as proportions and not percentages. The mode is shown with 5th and 95th percentiles in brackets.

P*u 1% 5% 0.1%
September–April Bycatch 0.01 (0.01–0.02) 0.06 (0.04–0.08) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Trap 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 0.12 (0.10–0.20) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Swan Catch 0.00 (0.00–0.02) 0.07 (0.02–0.09) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Found dead 0.30 (0.14–0.53) 0.95 (0.52–0.98) 0.03 (0.01–0.07)
Hunt 0.01 (0.01–0.03) 0.09 (0.03–0.15) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Sentinel 0.73 (0.43–0.89) 1.00 (0.94–1.00) 0.12 (0.05–0.20)
May–August Bycatch 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Trap 0.08 (0.06–0.11) 0.42 (0.28–0.45) 0.01 (0.01–0.01)
Swan Catch 0.03 (0.01–0.08) 0.32 (0.04–0.34) 0.01 (0.00–0.01)
Found dead 0.37 (0.19–0.66) 1.00 (0.64–1.00) 0.04 (0.02–0.10)
Hunt 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
Sentinel 0.56 (0.33–0.80) 1.00 (0.86–1.00) 0.08 (0.04–0.15)