Free access
Issue
Vet. Res.
Volume 37, Number 1, January-February 2006
Page(s) 25 - 48
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2005047
Published online 13 December 2005
How to cite this article Vet. Res. (2006) 25-48
Vet. Res. 37 (2006) 25-48
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2005047

Incidence of intramammary infections during the dry period without or with antibiotic treatment in dairy cows - a quantitative analysis of published data

Aurélie Roberta, b, Henri Seegersa and Nathalie Bareillea

a  Unit of Animal Health Management, ENVN/INRA, BP 40706, Nantes Cedex 03, France
b  ARILAIT Recherches, 42 rue de Châteaudun, 75314 Paris Cedex 09, France

(Received 17 September 2004; accepted 1 July 2005; published online 13 December 2005)

Abstract - The study was aimed at summarising the literature that compares the incidence levels of spontaneously occurring intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period, without versus with antibiotic dry cow treatment (DCT). A meta-analytic relative risk (RR) calculation was implemented when a priori relevant. Two main categories of comparison were used in the 36 selected papers. In the first category, the udder quarters were randomly allocated (at quarter or cow level) to an untreated or a treated group. Quarter incidence averaged 12.8% (weighted mean) in untreated quarters, and depending on the DCT used, from 6.6 to 8.0% in treated quarters. The meta-analytic RR of new IMI for untreated versus treated quarters varied from 1.54 to 1.94, depending on the DCT used. DCT was mainly found effective against IMI due to streptococci and coagulase-positive staphylococci. Based on only a few papers, the application of an internal teat sealer was associated to a quite similar (or possibly better) protection against IMI than DCT, but only in a subpopulation of particular (selected) cows. In the second category of studies, a selective dry cow or quarter antibiotic-treatment (selective DCT or DQT), according to cow or quarter selection criteria, was compared to blanket DCT. The meta-analytic RR of new IMI was 1.71 for selective DCT versus blanket DCT. Selective DQT seemed to be more at risk than selective DCT, but consisted of treating a much lower proportion of quarters. The summary-results provided by our meta-analysis should only be used with caution, due to possibly low external validity. More research seems to be relevant on the risk factors of new IMI during the dry period to make the outcomes of omission of DCT in selected cows more predictable under field conditions.


Key words: dairy cow / mastitis / risk / dry-cow treatment / meta-analysis

Corresponding author: Aurélie Robert arobert@vet-nantes.fr

© INRA, EDP Sciences 2005